This database is designed to not only provide an efficient listing mechanism for formations, but also method of analyzing and discussing formation to increase strategic understanding.
I would have just taken him up on the challenge haha. But seriously, the purpose of improving your setup can be approached independently of improving your game play.
As Tagier was implying, even if you play with a set well, the set isn't necessarily good. I think its pretty solid, you put some pieces in aggressive positions. But from what you know about LWs, probability, and possible opposing forms, some pieces are just vulnerable.
I think your set is pretty weak on defense. Lets face it, an unlucky block or lucky hit can put you on defense no matter how aggressive your set is or how well you play. And if your pieces are too committed to offense, that could decide the game for you (when it doesn't have to!). /explanation
Post a new comment or reply!
By submitting this post I agree with, and will abide by the terms and conditions of using this site.
Comments
(6) | Sort by | Page 1Once again, it is a bad set.
As Tagier was implying, even if you play with a set well, the set isn't necessarily good. I think its pretty solid, you put some pieces in aggressive positions. But from what you know about LWs, probability, and possible opposing forms, some pieces are just vulnerable.
I think your set is pretty weak on defense. Lets face it, an unlucky block or lucky hit can put you on defense no matter how aggressive your set is or how well you play. And if your pieces are too committed to offense, that could decide the game for you (when it doesn't have to!). /explanation